Skip to main content

CliQ People Index – July 2026

Published: July 20, 2026
Last Updated: July 20, 2026
Duration: 7 mins
CliQ People Index - July 2026

CliQ People Index · July 2026 · Issue 01

How the workforce is really feeling

The CliQ People Index is a monthly read on how employees talk about work when no one from HR is in the room. This issue, negative sentiment leads at 38% — and it clusters in a telling place: the mechanisms companies run at employees (workload, surveys, leadership) draw the sharpest criticism, while the structures employees build with each other (mentorship, community) draw the most warmth.

Editor’s Note

This month, workers are sending a clear signal to their employers: nobody trusts the employee survey. Our data shows employee surveys are common during the summer months, but sentiment continues to trend extremely negative. Not only do employees distrust the survey’s anonymity outright, many feel their responses will be actively used against them if the results aren’t favorable to the company or their direct managers. What’s more, employees continue to feel that survey results lead to little or no action, even when they are actively and directly voicing exactly what they need. HR leaders aren’t usually the blocker to implementing the changes employees need — what’s clear is that employees strongly distrust leadership to make the right decisions, something we’ve seen specifically in our bi-annual Employer Pulse Index, where average CEO sentiment has taken a sharp downturn over the past several years in most industries.

This month at a glance

38%
negative
35%
neutral
27%
positive
585
employee posts analyzed this period
Negative 38% Neutral 35% Positive 27%

Share of employee posts analyzed across the period.

−11
CliQ People Index mood score · net sentiment (positive − negative)
−100 · all negative 0 · neutral +100 · all positive
Negative sentiment outweighs positive by 11 points this period — a workforce more discontented than energized, though not in crisis.
Share the CliQ People Index mood score

Sentiment over time

Negative sentiment has held a stubborn floor near 40% since early June, while positivity swings week to week — the workforce’s mood is less about hitting new lows than about a persistent, low-grade discontent that isn’t lifting.

100% 50% 0 32Jun 4 27Jun 8 41Jun 15 41Jun 22 43Jun 29 39Jul 6 35Jul 13 Negative Neutral Positive % of weekly posts · number = % negative

What’s driving it, by theme

The mood isn’t uniform — it’s a tale of two workplaces. Workload and burnout (90% negative) and the employee survey (62% negative) are the pain centers, with leadership close behind. Meanwhile mentorship and community are the brightest spots employees have, and career talk skews aspirational rather than angry.

Career growth & developmentn=169 Surveys & feedbackn=146 Leadership & managementn=81 ERG & communityn=58 Mentorshipn=51 Onboarding & trainingn=27 Workload & burnoutn=20 Pay & compensationn=12 Recognitionn=10 100%-stacked; each bar = that theme’s posts this period. Negative Neutral Positive

The net view: what employees love and resent

Stripping each theme to a single number — positive share minus negative share — sorts the workplace into what earns goodwill and what burns it. Mentorship and community sit firmly in the green; the survey, pay, and workload sit deep in the red.

net 0 Mentorship+35 ERG & community+29 Career growth & development+11 Onboarding & training0 Leadership & management−21 Recognition−30 Pay & compensation−34 Surveys & feedback−51 Workload & burnout−80 ← resented credited →

Net sentiment = positive share − negative share, per theme.

The divergence that matters

Sentiment doesn’t split by whether people like their job — it splits by who owns the mechanism. The instruments leadership controls draw skepticism; the structures employees build with each other draw warmth. For people leaders, that’s a map: it shows which levers have lost the workforce’s trust, and which still have it.

Draws frustration — the top-down machinery
  • Workload & burnout — 90% negative, the sharpest of any theme.
  • The employee survey — 62% negative: anonymity doubts, results that vanish into a meeting.
  • Leadership — 47% negative: managers described as “deaf to their actual needs.”
Draws credit — the peer & community layer
  • Community & ERGs — 53% positive: “community,” “support,” “almost completely positive.”
  • Mentorship — 45% positive and only 10% negative: skill-building that surfaces future managers.
  • Career growth — more aspirational than angry: mostly people mapping a way forward.

The three pillars, scored

Measured against the three pillars that define modern employee development — skills, career, and community — sentiment is net positive in all three. The development-and-community layer is where goodwill still lives, even as the survey-and-workload climate around it runs negative.

Skills development
+23
38% positive · 15% negative
mentorship + onboarding · n=78
Community engagement
+21
49% positive · 28% negative
ERGs + recognition · n=68
Career development
+11
31% positive · 20% negative
career growth & progression · n=169

Net sentiment (positive − negative share) within each pillar’s themes.

Rebuild the mechanisms employees actually trust

Skills, career, and community are where goodwill still lives. See how MentorcliQ’s platform turns those signals into action.

Request a demo

In their own words

The survey isn’t trusted

“The only response he got on it was ‘just run your employee survey responses through AI, it reads like a bad Tripadvisor review.’”
r/careeradvice · Jul 2026 · source
“You might be surprised how much people hate their managers for being completely deaf to their actual needs. Some recent surveys show over 70% are dissatisfied…”
r/managers · Jul 2026 · source

The career ladder has no rungs

“There is literally no training / structure in place for employee development or career progression upwards… when I asked for points to achieve to get a promotion, my manager didn’t really know what to say.”
r/careerguidance · Jun 2026 · source

What actually works: community & mentorship

“There is a Neurodivergent Employee Resource Group that has provided information, community, and support for me and other neurodivergent colleagues.”
r/WAStateWorkers · Jul 2026 · source
“We implemented a mentoring program for new sellers… partnered with a seasoned seller… This has helped us identify the next managers.”
r/Sales_Professionals · Jun 2026 · source

What it means for people leaders

This month’s signal is a roadmap. Employees are telling you which levers have lost their trust — workload, the survey, the invisible career path — and which still have it: community, mentorship, coaching managers. Rebuilding confidence won’t come from another survey; it comes from the mechanisms employees already praise: structured mentorship, visible career pathways, and real community. That is the connective tissue MentorcliQ’s Career, Skills, and Community pillars are built to restore.

Turn this month’s signal into next month’s progress

MentorcliQ helps people leaders rebuild trust through structured mentorship, visible career pathways, and real community.

Request a demo
Methodology. The CliQ People Index tracks employee sentiment across public online conversation, monitoring dozens of workplace communities and hundreds of keywords relevant to employee engagement and development. Each post is classified for relevance, sentiment, and theme, then rolled up to measure how the workforce is feeling across skills development, career development, and community-engagement categories. This issue reflects sentiment over the weeks through mid-July 2026. It is a directional read of public conversation — people who post publicly skew toward the vocal — and is intended as a barometer of where workforce attention and frustration are concentrated, not a representative survey of all employees.

Part of the CliQ index family — CliQ People Index (employee sentiment, monthly) · CliQ Employer Pulse Index (employer & CEO ratings, bi-annual) · Impact Report (Fortune 500 industry trends, annual).

Modal

Join the Best

The smart way to build mentorship programs that drive impact.